tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7310946608587805029.post2767747748674124092..comments2024-03-13T01:48:29.943-04:00Comments on Unbiased Research: The unseen biases by the peer review processTJ Murphyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17292359594683490598noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7310946608587805029.post-89717563787334566552016-04-30T19:41:52.520-04:002016-04-30T19:41:52.520-04:00I totally agree that news tools will be very helpf...I totally agree that news tools will be very helpful in finding flawed publication. In recent decades, we've seen many retractions and misconduct in different areas of research. Also of note, inevitable portion of biomedical research papers couldn't be reproduced and a lot more is out there to be found. I'm glad you brought this up even I'm not sure if the tools have been widely used by reviewers or not. It could be one way to alert scientists of not publishing misconducted results to others. <br /><br />But still, the publication pressure nowadays pushes a few scientists out of mind. Science can't be always right; we need criticism while we are reading other's work. However, this can't justify for those who acknowledge the possible flaws but still publish in order to have a successful career. These tools might not be adequate to weep out the problem. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02174920734022385870noreply@blogger.com