Is a cure a problem?
Vox media published an article titled “Half of the cancer drugs journalists called “miracles”and “cures” were not approved by the FDA,” in October 2015 stating that the use of attractive adjectives in drug advertisements is biasing the consumer by marketing drugs that are not available in clinic. Belluz, author of the article, states this “overselling” of a drug is creating false hope for patients as well as, helping to form misguided policies. While the claims are not false, this form of bias is not harmful but hopeful.
Vox media published an article titled “Half of the cancer drugs journalists called “miracles”and “cures” were not approved by the FDA,” in October 2015 stating that the use of attractive adjectives in drug advertisements is biasing the consumer by marketing drugs that are not available in clinic. Belluz, author of the article, states this “overselling” of a drug is creating false hope for patients as well as, helping to form misguided policies. While the claims are not false, this form of bias is not harmful but hopeful.
Would
we get the average person to read science articles about the latest drug
discoveries if these adjectives were not included in the title? Probably not.
If adding a word to the title biases a person towards reading a piece of
science it may be a necessary evil for the public. Also, if policies are being
formed by this public, why do these policies have to be misguided? Are the
titles so profound that they neglect the rest of the article? Are they truly so
biased by the title that they don’t feel it necessary to make an informed and
educated opinion? The argument that these words are misguiding policy makers is
poor without proof of what these policy makers read prior to decision making.
Break-through,
ground breaking, and cure may be deceptive words but they are also providing
optimism for patients and caregivers. Optimism bias clouds our perception of
reality. This optimism bias can provide comfort to the patient without options.
Maybe these drugs being described aren’t the real cure for cancer but, they are
inherently providing hope. Belluz states this hope is bad but hope is one of
the necessary ingredients for fighting cancer. It is why there are colored
ribbons, fundraising events, and millions of dollars flowing into cancer
research. Cancer research is being done and that means the cure is closer. The
adjectives describing these discoveries are motivating lay people to spend
their time learning and donating to a worthy cause. A biased consumer is a
hopeful consumer in the profession of drug discovery.
No comments:
Post a Comment