As I’ve gotten into my research project, I’ve begun to notice
the lack of accountability that presides within the scientific field. Research
projects typically have one or a few people working on them, and the temptation
to make data look better is high. As evidenced by the many papers retracted
each publishing cycle, there is major fraud going on within research, and I
think it stems from a lack of accountability and responsibility felt by those
carrying out fraudulent practices. It’s not a crazy thing to say, as well, that
none of us are completely immune to it. As Alex Chen enlighted us to the fraud
that occurred at Duke
University, it is perhaps too easy to manipulate data, or worse, invent
subjects and data that never even existed.
In 2015, New York University bioethicist Arthur
Caplan said, “The currency of science is fragile, and
allowing counterfeiters, fraudsters, bunko artists, scammers, and cheats to
continue to operate with abandon in the publishing realm is unacceptable.” Fraud
in science is on the rise, and not only is it a threat to those individuals’
careers, but it is a threat to all research. Science is designed to enlighten, provide
methods to answer sought out questions, and in the end to save lives, and when
fraud enters into the science, none of that can occur. Probably one of the main arguments for those
that have falsified data is the pressure to obtain funding and publish in a
funding environment that has become very strict over the past few years. What
they don’t see is how big of a threat fraudulent data is to public funding. The
public doesn’t like being lied to, especially when it has to do with potential
medical breakthroughs and their own health, and as fraud continues to come in
front of the public eye, funding will most likely decrease. Trust from the
public is necessary for funding, and maintaining honesty and integrity in
research is necessary for that trust.
An added complexity to this already complex mess of fraudulent
research is the idea that it might not be the wanted success and fame that
pushes them to be fraudulent, but it could be the necessity to put food on the
table for their family. Not only are
scientists striving to provide meaningful research to further medicine
(hopefully), but they are also striving to feed their families. Would having a
system in which accountability and responsibility were incumbent on the researchers
(by some type of education or university program) decrease the temptation to
falsify results? Would having a system in which the publish or perish mentality
was somehow alleviated, and there was security of an income, decrease the
temptation to falsify results? Would journals that began publishing negative,
nonsignificant results with repeated experiments from other papers help
decrease the temptation to falsify results? And can such a system exist, let
alone be put in place?
I believe it is necessary for the sustainability of
scientific research to report data correctly. This might only happen if there
is some sense of accountability and responsibility. Scientists are humans.
We need to eat. But we are expected, like most other humans are expected, to be
upright, have integrity, and not lie. Is there a way we can do good science,
remain upright, and eat?
No comments:
Post a Comment